Costs relate to the understanding of markets and well, libertarianism. I have my operational reservations against libertarianism but there is need for a better understanding of this animal.
A simple rule often works dramatically well when you apply it consistently. Let who does a damage pay for the damage. There are complexities which go beyond the scope of this post but that should suffice a starting point to think more. The idea is based on the cost incurred in a market setting.
So if a market does not involve the payment or consideration of externalities than it is a poorly designed market. All that talk about freedom and choice of libertarianism is first-level knowledge. When you understand who is incurring the cost and who should pay for it, you are one level deeper into the complexity of it. The next part is in designing the incentives to make sure that the party who does the damage pays for it or takes into account the costs of his activity that may cause damage.
For the context of what follows read A Nation of Guinea Pigs, but it is not necessary.
The difference between bureaucratic regulation and legislative regulations should be pointed out. Having a government board to clear a clinical trial is bureaucratic regulation. Having a regulation that allows a legal argument between two parties for deciding the costs incurred, in case of a faulty trial, is a legislative regulation.
India has an oversupply of the former and an under supply of the latter, in quality and quantity.
In fact, there is a crying need for regulation. Free-markets need more regulations and litigation. But to equate demand of regulation with government supply of regulation is an usual jump in logic and can be faulted. Today the government does bureaucratic regulation which we know doesn't work and well, won't work. If something goes wrong, you cannot point to the government and ask them for compensation. If the legislative regulation had allowed for litigation and mechanisms like civil tort, you would have a host of lawyers scavenging the grounds of Sevagram. Ultimately the true costs and benefits of guinea-pig treatment would be taken into account by both parties.
In finality, you need more legislative supply of regulations that allow litigation between the parties directly, not bureaucratic ones that distort the market of costs.
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Monday, January 3, 2011
AICTE: Waking up from 61 years of slumber
May a million flowers bloom, said Chairman Mao. And one day, on a whim, he went and razed the garden.
In India, flowers and gardens remain scarce but a million other things bloom. Illegal construction. Unregulated educational institutions. Until one fine day, someone wakes up and commands, "Hatao!"
But this is not China, so people take to the streets in protest. Like the students of Satyabhama engineering college and SRM Institute of Science and Technology - both deemed universities. Hundreds of students of these colleges held demonstrations demanding to know the status and validity of their degrees.
This followed a notice from AICTE (All India Council for Technical Education) which apparently stated that B.Tech degrees awarded by deemed universities would not be recognised, unless the courses were approved by the council.
Students of the Dr. MGR Deemed University and Bharat Engineering College had gone on strike for four days on the same issue, a few days ago.
The colleges were battling it out in court, and said that since they had UGC approval they did not come under the purview of AICTE.
What took so long?
The sad part was, in all these ‘technical’ discussions of eligibility and approval, the fate of thousands of students who took admission in good faith hung in balance.
We do need a regulatory body but clearly, AICTE is like an old and toothless ayah running around and shouting, “Children, don’t be naughty.” What else could one say about a regulatory body which, Kumbhakaran-like, awakes from its stupor once every 5 decades or so?
Did you know that All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) was first set-up in November 1945??!!! Yup, that’s what it says on their website and honestly it was news to me.
AICTE was meant to be: "a national level Apex Advisory Body to conduct survey on the facilities on technical education and to promote development in the country in a coordinated and integrated manner."
But something, somewhere went awry. So…
The Government of India (Ministry of Human Resource Development) constituted a National Working Group to look into the role of AICTE in the context of proliferation of technical institutions, maintenance of standards and other related matters. The Working Group recommended that AICTE be vested with the necessary statutory authority for making it more effective, which would consequently require restructuring and strengthening with necessary infrastructure and operating mechanisms.
Wonderful. Is that why AICTE was suddenly getting so active? Er, not exactly. These recommendations were made in 1987 !! The AICTE Act came into force a year later…
The statutory All India Council for Technical Education was established on May 12, 1988 with a view to proper planning and coordinated development of technical education system throughout the country, the promotion of qualitative improvement of such education in relation to planned quantitative growth and the regulation and proper maintenance of norms and standards in the technical education system and for matters connected therewith.
Phew – quite a mouthful. But no one had a clue where AICTE was in the 1990's when engineering, management and medical colleges were mushrooming all over the country.
Many of these colleges were started by politicians, and flouted every conceivable norm (‘technical institutes’ in sheds with tin roofs for example – that was the state of some colleges in New Bombay when they first came up). Money and muscle power ensured AICTE looked the other way.
Now, the powers that be were keen to rectify the situation. AICTE was publishing notice after notice in newspapers imploring technical institutes to apply for accreditation – and threatening legal action against those who do not comply. But colleges are thinking, we’re all in it together – can they really shut down hundreds of us?
Well, Amity Business School’s flagship PGDM course actually lost its AICTE accreditation in September 2005 after failing to meet prescribed norms. Amity also lost the subsequent case in the Allahabad High Court challenging the AICTE order.
But surely in the course of an entire year it could not have been the only institute found unworthy of accreditation? Why was so much speed shown in revoking Amity’s accreditation while others received only threats and warnings??
The point being that unless AICTE was perceived as being fair, impartial and speedy in its actions it would never be taken seriously.
Secondly, however badly a college may have sinned revoking accreditation in the middle of an academic year was senseless. All such announcements must be made before the start of a session and must apply to new admissions – not students already enrolled!
The Tamil Nadu tangle
I don’t have an intimate knowledge of the scene in Tamil Nadu but I do know that SRM and Satyabhama were – at least till a couple of years ago – well respected colleges. Students rated them in the top 10 in the state and SRM even produced ‘state rank holders '.
Then, they became deemed universities and according to this news report, went in for reckless expansion
The Tamil daily Dinamalar, in its report dated 2 September 2003, had highlighted the massive expansion of capacity by the SRM Engineering College: "on obtaining the deemed university status, SRM Engineering College has admitted 2000 students netting in Rs.300 crore. In the much sought-after ECE course, 600 students had been admitted. A complaint on this had been sent to the chief minister's office, which has initiated an enquiry."
The complaint pointed out that the college, which until 2005, had a total strength of just 2000, had admitted more than 2000 fresh students that year. Against the optimum strength of around 50 per class, that year, it had admitted 80 students in each section for the ECE course collecting Rs.2 lakh per student. It is gathered that the principal had opted to resign unable to cope with this crowd.
Can current students throw some further light on the situation? Are they satisfied with their course?? And if all is above board what is the institute’s problem in applying for AICTE accreditation anyways???
AICTE cannot take action against Deemed Universities: HC
The Madras High Court ruled that the All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE) had the authority to inspect deemed universities but any action against them could be only taken by the University Grants Commission (UGC).
A Division Bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice A P Shah and Justice Prabha Sridevan made the observation while quashing a public notice issued by the AICTE in February last, warning of stringent legal action against Deemed Universities which conducted new courses and programmes, without its prior approval.
Disposing of petitions filed by about 20 deemed universities in Tamil Nadu, the judges pointed out that according to a UGC communication, "the AICTE may visit the university department or constituent college and send its final report to the the UGC for final approval".
Noting that the AICTE team conducting any inspection of deemed universities had the representation of the UGC, the bench said if the UGC did not depute such a member within a reasonable time, the AICTE could proceed to conduct the inspection and forward its report to the UGC for action.
Referring to the notices sent by the AICTE and the UGC calling for information regarding the courses offered and those introduced after being declared Deemed Universities and whether UGC approval had been taken, the bench directed all universities to respond to the notices within four weeks if they had not done so.
The Madras High Court, in an interim direction relating to the regulatory jurisdiction of the AICTE and the UGC over deemed universities, has instructed the former to issue a public notice advising students to attend classes.
Reserving its final order, a bench comprising Chief Justice A P Shah and Justice Prabha Sridevan said the AICTE in its advertisement should mention that students must return to their colleges, since failure to attend classes would result in their losing an academic year.
It must be published in English and Indian language newspapers, the judges said.
The bench indicated that orders would be pronounced in the third week of May and observed that all deemed universities must take prior permission from the UGC before starting new courses.
The AICTE could be part of the inspection team mandated to visit deemed universities, the judges added.
The Madras High Court had asked AICTE to furnish details based on which it issued a press notice on February 16, 2006 stipulating that all institutions offering technical education should apply for AICTE approval on or before March 7, 2006.
The First Bench comprising Chief Justice A.P. Shah and Justice Prabha Sridevan, hearing a batch of petitions relating to the regulatory jurisdiction of the AICTE and the UGC over deemed universities, also asked counsel for the AICTE as to why it issued such a press notice only in respect of deemed universities located in Tamil Nadu.
During the course of arguments, the Bench also observed that there seemed to be an "overlapping of interests" in the Anna University Vice-Chancellor holding an additional charge of the Chairman of the Southern Regional Committee of the AICTE.
In his submissions, K. Chandru, senior counsel for the UGC, contended that the AICTE should give its inputs about the infrastructure and intake of deemed universities only when its advice is sought for. The UGC need not act on the unsolicited advice from the AICTE, he said, adding that similarly the Ministry of Human Resources Development was not bound by the unsolicited inputs from either of the statutory bodies. Such an advice was mandatory and not directory in nature, he said.
In April 2005 the UGC wrote to deemed universities calling upon them furnish information relating to academic standards, infrastructure and intake in their institutions. Maintaining that the Commission was processing the response, Mr. Chandru said if the amenities in these institutions were found unsatisfactory the UGC would recommend to the Central Government to revoke their deemed university status. If they met the requirements they would be accorded recognition, he added.
G. Rajagopal, senior counsel for the Thanjavur-based SASTRA Deemed University, submitted that the institution was open to inspection irrespective of the agency involved in the process. He said all relevant information called for by the statutory agencies had already been submitted by the administration.
The UGC and the AICTE “have no idea how to maintain standards”, said former IIT Madras director PV Indiresan. “Their culture is bureaucratic; they think that national accreditation will do. Even a simple observation of the number of responsible assessors needed to monitor 17,000 odd colleges will show that centralised accreditation is not the answer.”
In a recent survey in Businessworld, 64 per cent of the recruiters surveyed said AICTE accreditation is not important. One of the top business schools in India — the Indian School of Business (ISB) — did not have AICTE accreditation. Madras HC moved againt Anna Varsity VC for holding a sensitive post in AICTE.
Who says office of profit issue is concerned only with politicians. In the case of Anna University VC you know which one is office of profit. Remember that one of the solutions in the AICTE (All Included Commission for offering Technical Education)Vs Tamilnadu Deemed Universities was that these deemed universities loosened their deemed status and get doomed meaning affiliated to Big Brother Anna University.
Is AICTE nod obligatory for deemed university?
AICTE had been immature and in many ways unprofessional. It was time that it became a truly professional outfit for guiding the growth of technical education in the country or packup and vanish.
Although AICTE was vested with statutory powers by an Act of Indian Parliament in 1987 with the mandate to organise, plan and administer technical education in the country, Way back in September 2001, the Supreme Court of India had given a judgment that it was not obligatory for a university, created under an Act of a competent legislature, to seek and secure prior approval of the All India Council for Technical Education ( AICTE ) to start a department for imparting a course or programme in technical education or a technical institution as an adjunct to the university itself to conduct technical courses of its choice and selection.
The Supreme Court Bench which included Mr. Justice Doraiswamy Raju had set aside the verdict of the Madras High Court ( HC ) - which held that it was obligatory on the part of the appellant- Bharathidasan University to secure prior approval of the AICTE to commence the specified technical courses.
The Bench, on close analysis of the relevant provisions of the AICTE Act 1987, University Grants Commission Act, 1956, pointed out that the clear intention of the legislature ( in enacting the AICTE Act ) was not that all institutions whether university or otherwise ought to be treated as technical institutions covered by the ( AICTE ) Act.
The Bench had pointed out that if that was the intention, there was no difficulty for the legislature to have merely provided a definition of technical institution by not excluding university from the definition thereof and thereby avoided the necessity to use alongside both the words technical institutions and university in several provisions in the Act.
The Bench had also observed that the definition of technical institution excluded from its purview a university, and when by definition a university was excluded from a technical institution, to interpret that such a clause or such an expression wherever the expression technical institution occured will include a university will be reading into the Act what is not provided therein.
The Bench had further added that the power to grant approval for starting new technical institutions and for introduction of new courses or programmes in consultation with the agencies concerned was covered by Section 10( k ) which would not cover a university but only a technical institution.
The Bench had noted that if Section 10 ( k ) of AICTE act did not cover a university but only a technical institution, a regulation could not be framed in such a manner so as to apply the regulation framed in respect of technical institution to apply for universities when the Act maintains a complete dichotomy between a university and a technical institution.
AICTE had been sponsoring short term training programmes at SRM Deemed University and today AICTE says SRM degrees were good for nothing!!. Probably there was no cooperation between the sponsorship cell of AICTE and Accreditation Cell of AICTE!!. It was time AICTE was accredited by someone competent.
Although, legally speaking, no technical institution was outside the AICTE's purview, it was only by convention that the Council did not exercise its statutory powers on institutions such as IITs and IIMs. If Law is same for everyone, why are there exceptions?
AICTE and Deemed University Case for Contra Proferentum Rule:
If in a legally enforceable agreement between two or more competent agencies any ambiguity arises, the interpretation should be against the party seeking to rely on it i.e. proferer or the person who drafted the document.
War clouds had gathered over the Madras High court in the sensational case between the Deemed universities and AICTE ( All India Council for Technical Education ) for which the final verdict is awaited.
The AICTE act 1987 states "To provide for establishment of an All India council for Technical Education with a view to the proper planning and co-ordinated development of the technical education system throughout the country, the promotion of qualitative improvement of such education in relation to planned quantitative growth and the regulation and proper maintenance of norms and standards in the technical education system and for matters connected therewith."
The above makes it obligatory that for proper planning and regulation of quantitative growth and coordinated development of Technical Education, AICTE act should have included that universities deemed or otherwise must be required to take its approval for offering technical education.
The Supreme Court of India Bench Judgement in September 2001 had clearly stated that the power to grant approval for starting new technical institutions and for introduction of new courses or programmes in consultation with the agencies concerned was covered by Section 10( k ) of AICTE Act which would not cover a university. It clearly emerged that AICTE nod was not obligatory for a university in this context.
If that was the case, then why was AICTE still claiming in its combined Regulations for Requirement of Grant of Approval which stated that "No course or programme shall be introduced by any Technical Institution, University including a Deemed University or University Department or College" EXCEPT WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE COUNCIL.
However, AICTE claimed that the other Sections of the AICTE Act 1987 such as Section 10( o ) and 11 empowered the AICTE to prescribe guidelines for admissions and inspection of deemed universities.
It was clear that in the AICTE Act there was an ambiguity between the various Sections as one of them 10( k ) states that the term Technical Institution did not include University while AICTE claims that in other Sections the term Technical Institution included University.
If AICTE Act was an agreement regarding mutual responsibilities between two or more parties, then it amounted to a Contract between the Law Enforcers ( AICTE ) and the Law Abiders ( Deemed Universities ).
Contra Proferentum is the Rule that is applied when interpreting a clause, in an action that says that, where ambiguity as to a terms meaning exists, it should be read against the party who wrote it. That is, the preferred interpretation will be the one that helps the party who drafted it the least. The reasoning behind this Rule is to encourage the drafter of the agreement to be as clear and explicit as possible and to take into account as many foreseeable situations as possible.
Clearly, the drafters of the AICTE Act had failed in this account and they had to face the music of Contra Proferentum Rule and let the Deemed Universities retain their autonomy in birth as well as functioning. Whoever gave birth to Deemed University only should hold the right to ring the Death Bell for them and middle men of the AICTE kind should keep safe distance.
According to the Vice Chancellor of the Anna University Prof D Viswanathan, there were four lakh engineering graduates unemployed in Tamilnadu and the writing on the wall was clear that bulk of this number came from the so called AICTE approved Institutions in Tamilnadu and not the Deemed Universities !!!!.
Although, legally speaking, no technical institution was outside the AICTE's purview, it was only by convention that the Council did not exercise its statutory powers on institutions such as IIT's and IIM's. If Law is same for everyone, why are there exceptions? Now read the following and decide.
As per latest news, the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Delhi has been facing a severe shortage of faculty.
Twenty-four departments in IIT-D are short-staffed. "There are 72 vacant positions for professors, associate professors, and assistant professors," according to Assistant Director(administration) D.P. Kothari.
AICTE's policies regarding conformance to their academic policies are fairly rigid. It is an improper move to declare such a notice after everyone has committed themselves to an institute. I don't understand the point in removing institutes which have been successful from their inception. As said in the post, it is the facilities that need to be checked and as long as the standards are complied with AICTE should have no trouble with these insititutes.
It is not just the recognition part ,but a bigger malaise that is eating the system. Spare a thought for the faculty at such establishments. Most of the lecturers are in the transitional mode between their own graduation and a real job.
A typical visit by the AICTE team would be characterized by sprucing up of the lawns & facilities. Endless plates of Kaju and Baadam would be consumed and Cola bottles circulated. ExIIT professors ( alleged visting faculty )would mysteriously appear in full strength and disappear just as suddenly till another team arrives... .
Every year NASSCOM comes out with figures that the IT sector is falling short of qualified manpower..on the other hand we are churning out Engineers faster than bunny litter...
The solution is not in the hands of the government. The corporate sector would have to assume greater role...update the curriculum, engage the faculty and actually authenticate the utility by recruiting from the less fortunate colleges.
Expansion by itself is not a bad thing - doing so without inadequate teachers, facilities etc is what needs to be checked.
Between the out and out commercialism (of colleges) and the out and out bureacucracy (of AICTE) lies a middle ground which desperately needs to be explored.
In India, flowers and gardens remain scarce but a million other things bloom. Illegal construction. Unregulated educational institutions. Until one fine day, someone wakes up and commands, "Hatao!"
But this is not China, so people take to the streets in protest. Like the students of Satyabhama engineering college and SRM Institute of Science and Technology - both deemed universities. Hundreds of students of these colleges held demonstrations demanding to know the status and validity of their degrees.
This followed a notice from AICTE (All India Council for Technical Education) which apparently stated that B.Tech degrees awarded by deemed universities would not be recognised, unless the courses were approved by the council.
Students of the Dr. MGR Deemed University and Bharat Engineering College had gone on strike for four days on the same issue, a few days ago.
The colleges were battling it out in court, and said that since they had UGC approval they did not come under the purview of AICTE.
What took so long?
The sad part was, in all these ‘technical’ discussions of eligibility and approval, the fate of thousands of students who took admission in good faith hung in balance.
We do need a regulatory body but clearly, AICTE is like an old and toothless ayah running around and shouting, “Children, don’t be naughty.” What else could one say about a regulatory body which, Kumbhakaran-like, awakes from its stupor once every 5 decades or so?
Did you know that All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) was first set-up in November 1945??!!! Yup, that’s what it says on their website and honestly it was news to me.
AICTE was meant to be: "a national level Apex Advisory Body to conduct survey on the facilities on technical education and to promote development in the country in a coordinated and integrated manner."
But something, somewhere went awry. So…
The Government of India (Ministry of Human Resource Development) constituted a National Working Group to look into the role of AICTE in the context of proliferation of technical institutions, maintenance of standards and other related matters. The Working Group recommended that AICTE be vested with the necessary statutory authority for making it more effective, which would consequently require restructuring and strengthening with necessary infrastructure and operating mechanisms.
Wonderful. Is that why AICTE was suddenly getting so active? Er, not exactly. These recommendations were made in 1987 !! The AICTE Act came into force a year later…
The statutory All India Council for Technical Education was established on May 12, 1988 with a view to proper planning and coordinated development of technical education system throughout the country, the promotion of qualitative improvement of such education in relation to planned quantitative growth and the regulation and proper maintenance of norms and standards in the technical education system and for matters connected therewith.
Phew – quite a mouthful. But no one had a clue where AICTE was in the 1990's when engineering, management and medical colleges were mushrooming all over the country.
Many of these colleges were started by politicians, and flouted every conceivable norm (‘technical institutes’ in sheds with tin roofs for example – that was the state of some colleges in New Bombay when they first came up). Money and muscle power ensured AICTE looked the other way.
Now, the powers that be were keen to rectify the situation. AICTE was publishing notice after notice in newspapers imploring technical institutes to apply for accreditation – and threatening legal action against those who do not comply. But colleges are thinking, we’re all in it together – can they really shut down hundreds of us?
Well, Amity Business School’s flagship PGDM course actually lost its AICTE accreditation in September 2005 after failing to meet prescribed norms. Amity also lost the subsequent case in the Allahabad High Court challenging the AICTE order.
But surely in the course of an entire year it could not have been the only institute found unworthy of accreditation? Why was so much speed shown in revoking Amity’s accreditation while others received only threats and warnings??
The point being that unless AICTE was perceived as being fair, impartial and speedy in its actions it would never be taken seriously.
Secondly, however badly a college may have sinned revoking accreditation in the middle of an academic year was senseless. All such announcements must be made before the start of a session and must apply to new admissions – not students already enrolled!
The Tamil Nadu tangle
I don’t have an intimate knowledge of the scene in Tamil Nadu but I do know that SRM and Satyabhama were – at least till a couple of years ago – well respected colleges. Students rated them in the top 10 in the state and SRM even produced ‘state rank holders '.
Then, they became deemed universities and according to this news report, went in for reckless expansion
The Tamil daily Dinamalar, in its report dated 2 September 2003, had highlighted the massive expansion of capacity by the SRM Engineering College: "on obtaining the deemed university status, SRM Engineering College has admitted 2000 students netting in Rs.300 crore. In the much sought-after ECE course, 600 students had been admitted. A complaint on this had been sent to the chief minister's office, which has initiated an enquiry."
The complaint pointed out that the college, which until 2005, had a total strength of just 2000, had admitted more than 2000 fresh students that year. Against the optimum strength of around 50 per class, that year, it had admitted 80 students in each section for the ECE course collecting Rs.2 lakh per student. It is gathered that the principal had opted to resign unable to cope with this crowd.
Can current students throw some further light on the situation? Are they satisfied with their course?? And if all is above board what is the institute’s problem in applying for AICTE accreditation anyways???
AICTE cannot take action against Deemed Universities: HC
The Madras High Court ruled that the All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE) had the authority to inspect deemed universities but any action against them could be only taken by the University Grants Commission (UGC).
A Division Bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice A P Shah and Justice Prabha Sridevan made the observation while quashing a public notice issued by the AICTE in February last, warning of stringent legal action against Deemed Universities which conducted new courses and programmes, without its prior approval.
Disposing of petitions filed by about 20 deemed universities in Tamil Nadu, the judges pointed out that according to a UGC communication, "the AICTE may visit the university department or constituent college and send its final report to the the UGC for final approval".
Noting that the AICTE team conducting any inspection of deemed universities had the representation of the UGC, the bench said if the UGC did not depute such a member within a reasonable time, the AICTE could proceed to conduct the inspection and forward its report to the UGC for action.
Referring to the notices sent by the AICTE and the UGC calling for information regarding the courses offered and those introduced after being declared Deemed Universities and whether UGC approval had been taken, the bench directed all universities to respond to the notices within four weeks if they had not done so.
The Madras High Court, in an interim direction relating to the regulatory jurisdiction of the AICTE and the UGC over deemed universities, has instructed the former to issue a public notice advising students to attend classes.
Reserving its final order, a bench comprising Chief Justice A P Shah and Justice Prabha Sridevan said the AICTE in its advertisement should mention that students must return to their colleges, since failure to attend classes would result in their losing an academic year.
It must be published in English and Indian language newspapers, the judges said.
The bench indicated that orders would be pronounced in the third week of May and observed that all deemed universities must take prior permission from the UGC before starting new courses.
The AICTE could be part of the inspection team mandated to visit deemed universities, the judges added.
The Madras High Court had asked AICTE to furnish details based on which it issued a press notice on February 16, 2006 stipulating that all institutions offering technical education should apply for AICTE approval on or before March 7, 2006.
The First Bench comprising Chief Justice A.P. Shah and Justice Prabha Sridevan, hearing a batch of petitions relating to the regulatory jurisdiction of the AICTE and the UGC over deemed universities, also asked counsel for the AICTE as to why it issued such a press notice only in respect of deemed universities located in Tamil Nadu.
During the course of arguments, the Bench also observed that there seemed to be an "overlapping of interests" in the Anna University Vice-Chancellor holding an additional charge of the Chairman of the Southern Regional Committee of the AICTE.
In his submissions, K. Chandru, senior counsel for the UGC, contended that the AICTE should give its inputs about the infrastructure and intake of deemed universities only when its advice is sought for. The UGC need not act on the unsolicited advice from the AICTE, he said, adding that similarly the Ministry of Human Resources Development was not bound by the unsolicited inputs from either of the statutory bodies. Such an advice was mandatory and not directory in nature, he said.
In April 2005 the UGC wrote to deemed universities calling upon them furnish information relating to academic standards, infrastructure and intake in their institutions. Maintaining that the Commission was processing the response, Mr. Chandru said if the amenities in these institutions were found unsatisfactory the UGC would recommend to the Central Government to revoke their deemed university status. If they met the requirements they would be accorded recognition, he added.
G. Rajagopal, senior counsel for the Thanjavur-based SASTRA Deemed University, submitted that the institution was open to inspection irrespective of the agency involved in the process. He said all relevant information called for by the statutory agencies had already been submitted by the administration.
The UGC and the AICTE “have no idea how to maintain standards”, said former IIT Madras director PV Indiresan. “Their culture is bureaucratic; they think that national accreditation will do. Even a simple observation of the number of responsible assessors needed to monitor 17,000 odd colleges will show that centralised accreditation is not the answer.”
In a recent survey in Businessworld, 64 per cent of the recruiters surveyed said AICTE accreditation is not important. One of the top business schools in India — the Indian School of Business (ISB) — did not have AICTE accreditation. Madras HC moved againt Anna Varsity VC for holding a sensitive post in AICTE.
Who says office of profit issue is concerned only with politicians. In the case of Anna University VC you know which one is office of profit. Remember that one of the solutions in the AICTE (All Included Commission for offering Technical Education)Vs Tamilnadu Deemed Universities was that these deemed universities loosened their deemed status and get doomed meaning affiliated to Big Brother Anna University.
Is AICTE nod obligatory for deemed university?
AICTE had been immature and in many ways unprofessional. It was time that it became a truly professional outfit for guiding the growth of technical education in the country or packup and vanish.
Although AICTE was vested with statutory powers by an Act of Indian Parliament in 1987 with the mandate to organise, plan and administer technical education in the country, Way back in September 2001, the Supreme Court of India had given a judgment that it was not obligatory for a university, created under an Act of a competent legislature, to seek and secure prior approval of the All India Council for Technical Education ( AICTE ) to start a department for imparting a course or programme in technical education or a technical institution as an adjunct to the university itself to conduct technical courses of its choice and selection.
The Supreme Court Bench which included Mr. Justice Doraiswamy Raju had set aside the verdict of the Madras High Court ( HC ) - which held that it was obligatory on the part of the appellant- Bharathidasan University to secure prior approval of the AICTE to commence the specified technical courses.
The Bench, on close analysis of the relevant provisions of the AICTE Act 1987, University Grants Commission Act, 1956, pointed out that the clear intention of the legislature ( in enacting the AICTE Act ) was not that all institutions whether university or otherwise ought to be treated as technical institutions covered by the ( AICTE ) Act.
The Bench had pointed out that if that was the intention, there was no difficulty for the legislature to have merely provided a definition of technical institution by not excluding university from the definition thereof and thereby avoided the necessity to use alongside both the words technical institutions and university in several provisions in the Act.
The Bench had also observed that the definition of technical institution excluded from its purview a university, and when by definition a university was excluded from a technical institution, to interpret that such a clause or such an expression wherever the expression technical institution occured will include a university will be reading into the Act what is not provided therein.
The Bench had further added that the power to grant approval for starting new technical institutions and for introduction of new courses or programmes in consultation with the agencies concerned was covered by Section 10( k ) which would not cover a university but only a technical institution.
The Bench had noted that if Section 10 ( k ) of AICTE act did not cover a university but only a technical institution, a regulation could not be framed in such a manner so as to apply the regulation framed in respect of technical institution to apply for universities when the Act maintains a complete dichotomy between a university and a technical institution.
AICTE had been sponsoring short term training programmes at SRM Deemed University and today AICTE says SRM degrees were good for nothing!!. Probably there was no cooperation between the sponsorship cell of AICTE and Accreditation Cell of AICTE!!. It was time AICTE was accredited by someone competent.
Although, legally speaking, no technical institution was outside the AICTE's purview, it was only by convention that the Council did not exercise its statutory powers on institutions such as IITs and IIMs. If Law is same for everyone, why are there exceptions?
AICTE and Deemed University Case for Contra Proferentum Rule:
If in a legally enforceable agreement between two or more competent agencies any ambiguity arises, the interpretation should be against the party seeking to rely on it i.e. proferer or the person who drafted the document.
War clouds had gathered over the Madras High court in the sensational case between the Deemed universities and AICTE ( All India Council for Technical Education ) for which the final verdict is awaited.
The AICTE act 1987 states "To provide for establishment of an All India council for Technical Education with a view to the proper planning and co-ordinated development of the technical education system throughout the country, the promotion of qualitative improvement of such education in relation to planned quantitative growth and the regulation and proper maintenance of norms and standards in the technical education system and for matters connected therewith."
The above makes it obligatory that for proper planning and regulation of quantitative growth and coordinated development of Technical Education, AICTE act should have included that universities deemed or otherwise must be required to take its approval for offering technical education.
The Supreme Court of India Bench Judgement in September 2001 had clearly stated that the power to grant approval for starting new technical institutions and for introduction of new courses or programmes in consultation with the agencies concerned was covered by Section 10( k ) of AICTE Act which would not cover a university. It clearly emerged that AICTE nod was not obligatory for a university in this context.
If that was the case, then why was AICTE still claiming in its combined Regulations for Requirement of Grant of Approval which stated that "No course or programme shall be introduced by any Technical Institution, University including a Deemed University or University Department or College" EXCEPT WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE COUNCIL.
However, AICTE claimed that the other Sections of the AICTE Act 1987 such as Section 10( o ) and 11 empowered the AICTE to prescribe guidelines for admissions and inspection of deemed universities.
It was clear that in the AICTE Act there was an ambiguity between the various Sections as one of them 10( k ) states that the term Technical Institution did not include University while AICTE claims that in other Sections the term Technical Institution included University.
If AICTE Act was an agreement regarding mutual responsibilities between two or more parties, then it amounted to a Contract between the Law Enforcers ( AICTE ) and the Law Abiders ( Deemed Universities ).
Contra Proferentum is the Rule that is applied when interpreting a clause, in an action that says that, where ambiguity as to a terms meaning exists, it should be read against the party who wrote it. That is, the preferred interpretation will be the one that helps the party who drafted it the least. The reasoning behind this Rule is to encourage the drafter of the agreement to be as clear and explicit as possible and to take into account as many foreseeable situations as possible.
Clearly, the drafters of the AICTE Act had failed in this account and they had to face the music of Contra Proferentum Rule and let the Deemed Universities retain their autonomy in birth as well as functioning. Whoever gave birth to Deemed University only should hold the right to ring the Death Bell for them and middle men of the AICTE kind should keep safe distance.
According to the Vice Chancellor of the Anna University Prof D Viswanathan, there were four lakh engineering graduates unemployed in Tamilnadu and the writing on the wall was clear that bulk of this number came from the so called AICTE approved Institutions in Tamilnadu and not the Deemed Universities !!!!.
Although, legally speaking, no technical institution was outside the AICTE's purview, it was only by convention that the Council did not exercise its statutory powers on institutions such as IIT's and IIM's. If Law is same for everyone, why are there exceptions? Now read the following and decide.
As per latest news, the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Delhi has been facing a severe shortage of faculty.
Twenty-four departments in IIT-D are short-staffed. "There are 72 vacant positions for professors, associate professors, and assistant professors," according to Assistant Director(administration) D.P. Kothari.
AICTE's policies regarding conformance to their academic policies are fairly rigid. It is an improper move to declare such a notice after everyone has committed themselves to an institute. I don't understand the point in removing institutes which have been successful from their inception. As said in the post, it is the facilities that need to be checked and as long as the standards are complied with AICTE should have no trouble with these insititutes.
It is not just the recognition part ,but a bigger malaise that is eating the system. Spare a thought for the faculty at such establishments. Most of the lecturers are in the transitional mode between their own graduation and a real job.
A typical visit by the AICTE team would be characterized by sprucing up of the lawns & facilities. Endless plates of Kaju and Baadam would be consumed and Cola bottles circulated. ExIIT professors ( alleged visting faculty )would mysteriously appear in full strength and disappear just as suddenly till another team arrives... .
Every year NASSCOM comes out with figures that the IT sector is falling short of qualified manpower..on the other hand we are churning out Engineers faster than bunny litter...
The solution is not in the hands of the government. The corporate sector would have to assume greater role...update the curriculum, engage the faculty and actually authenticate the utility by recruiting from the less fortunate colleges.
Expansion by itself is not a bad thing - doing so without inadequate teachers, facilities etc is what needs to be checked.
Between the out and out commercialism (of colleges) and the out and out bureacucracy (of AICTE) lies a middle ground which desperately needs to be explored.
Budget 2011 - my two bits
I am not in the habit of following the budget speech. But there's a first time for everything and I did tune in for some years. Mainly because I had to see 'what the budget did/ did not do for the youth'.
Listening to the FM's budget speech in full evoked in me a feeling similar to watching the annual Republic Day Parade. Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan, rural employment, mid-day meal and assorted other schemes named after members of the Gandhi-Nehru family were the first to march past.
I felt like making a trip to the nearest electrified village and doing a jig to the tune of 'thodi si dhool meri, dharti ki meri vatan ki'…If there is a road to reach that village in the first place.
Call me a cynic but this is how most of Young India feels when politicians rattle out statistics about 'development'. Seeing is believing and we don't like the dump of a country we see around a few islands of opulence and excellence.
Ironically, the FM's make a statement about young people building 'castles in the air'!
But sir, we're glad you used the word 'castle' and not humble jhopdi, or 1 room PWD apartment. We're glad that you approve of young India thinking and dreaming big. So are you.
Leaving aside the 'announcements' on duty cuts and tax tweaks which experts are better placed to analyse, what pleased me were some of the vision statements. Imagine an India where you don't have to stand in line to file a police complaint, get a birth certificate or register as a voter. Where you can demand information from government departments under the Right to Information Act through an online application.
No science fiction, that. The FM's plan to bring sarkari services online under a National E-governance plan. A more efficient and accountable government? Now that is something we will thank the FM for long after we've forgotten about cheaper soft drinks and Santros.
Speaking of thanks, students of Mumbai, Madras and Kolkata universities will be pleased with the Rs 50 crores allocated to each institution, in recognition of their completing 150 years. This is great news, except for the fact that the FM wants this money to be used for 'a specified research department or a research programme' when the problems that need to be addressed are far more basic!
And yet, as the minutes tick on, as achievements and proposed achievements parade by, you can't help getting carried away by a sense of pride. This is more just a 'budget', it is a document defining hope.
Because a budget implies 'living within one's means'. To which the young person's answer is I am not satisfied with that. Allow me to grow.
India is now a growth story and there is no looking back. What's more, the Finance Minister's end their speech with the immortal words of Swami Vivekananda, "We reap what we sow. We are the makers of our own fate. … our own destiny." Which is exactly what the young people of this country now believe.
For the underprivileged, the budget must continue to sow opportunities. And for the rest of us, allow us to enjoy the fruits of our own harvest.
There was more I wanted to say but could not due to the word limit. So here goes...
On education: The thrust of the budget outlay in education is towards primary and rural - rightly so. But higher education can't be left to fend for itself.
IISc Bangalore recieved Rs 100 crores in last to last year's budget towards upgradation and modernisation. Last year another well deserved Rs 100 crores went to Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
But what about a comprehensive policy that aims to upgrade all mediocre institutes to excellent ones, and the excellent to outstanding?
And also a quality control mechanism for private education. These are issues which of course need a whole separate forum for debate but if the primary schooling program is successful - imagine how many fold demand for higher education will increase say 10 years from now. And then, universities and colleges can't be set up or upgraded overnight!
On entrepreneurship: The Ministry of Finance has a pretty cool website where you can actually watch a webcast of the FM's speech and access budget speeches from previous years.
If you run a word search through the speeches you will find the word 'entrepreneur' used number of times.
Last year's speech specifically referred to young people building castles - and the FM said it is 'our job to lay the foundation for those castles'. So we enable you and you go out and create your own future.
Hope this translates to better power, roads, public transport - and other infrastructure which will allow us to be productive, not hassled citizens.
I am intrigued by this statement in particular: Recognize SMEs in the services sector, and treat the small scale enterprises in the services sector on par with the small scale enterprises in the manufacturing sector.
If this meant access to credit for entrepreneurs in the service sector it would be a great step forward. The idea of a world of commerce where you don't have plant and machinery to pledge as collateral remains alien to the loan officer in the average PSU bank. And this is a stumbling block for entrepreneurs, young and old alike.
On accountability and follow up: Not to say the FM's lie but achievements like '10,366 villages electrified' are - I hope - published separately and verified by independent agencies.
Lastly, this article in FE raises the pertinent question: Where are yesterday's budget ideas?
Before this year’s budget comes up with another list of new schemes for rural India and the environment, it may be worthwhile to look at where we have progressed with regard to some of the big announcements of earlier budgets.
The restoration of water bodies, the launching a horticulture mission, subsidies for micro-irrigation and the launching of a mega bio diesel plan were some of the major initiatives meant to breathe new life into India’s rural economy.
Unfortunately, by the time these schemes made their way through several ministries, it was already December 2005. With the end of the financial year round the corner, there was the usual rush to release money. In terms of actual work, however, there was very little to report.
Budgets I guess, have lost their relevance currently. Gone are the days when people used to assemble to hear luminaries like Nani Palkiwala give their take on the budget. The 91 budget was suppossed to be path breaking ..what did the newspapers report on the following say ..nobody told that india was entering a new era ..even now the major reforms are happening, but the budget is no indicator of the real policies and financial condition.
Doing away with the standard deduction for the salaried. So now the generally-no-way-out-of-the-tax salaried person is in the same league as a businessman, who has umpteen ways to hide his real income! Also sad to see the industry honchos giving unusually high marks to the FM. Why have such surveys in the first place when you know the boot licking industrialist won't dare say a word in earnest, for the fear of IT raids and other such govt retribution, if he publicly critises the FM.
What a whimper of budgets from the FM's. Seems like they are braindead...
Tax ATM usage. What!??
Wait there's more. Tax credit cards and debit cards further. Nuts !??!!
Umbrellas to cost more. Packaged food and poultry products to cost less, icecreams to cost less... blah blah !!
It seems like those old oppressive Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, VP Singh day budgets, where they decided the prices of little items like soap, detergents, toothbrushes, safety pins etc.
And in 2005, P.Chidambaram came up with the funniest harebrained idea .. withdrawal tax. If you withdraw your *own* money from the bank, you will be taxed.. ha haha..
Regarding grants to Universities, it seemed IISc haven't received 100 crores that it was granted last year. And, I can't vouch when will Madras, Bombay and Calcutta Universities receive their promised grants!! It happens only in India!!
And, in the last budget, there was an allocation of 1000 crores for a Desalination Plant in Chennai. Not a single word about that has come yet! Who is responsible? State or Central? What happens to such allocated but not spent money?
"But higher education can't be left to fend for itself. "
Primary and secondary education give far more social returns than higher / professional education.
Higher education should be liberalized and private players should be allowed to enter. The government should only set up an independent regulatory agency like the TRAI for the higher education sector. And yes, FDI should be allowed. Today, people are willing to pay for education. For those who can't, the private sector should offer scholarships to promising candidates. The not-so-promising ones can always get a loan - the banks will only be too happy to advance loans to students of good universities.
By giving a free rein to the market forces, the quality of education will automatically improve and stupid anomalies will disappear. It is good for the country to realise that it is the youth of this country that is going to take the country forward not someone like our esteemed politicians who are hell bend on wasting the country's money. For any development, infrastructure, transport and power is important. Unless and until we improve those, we will not be moving forward.
Does any one really verify the gibberish that is thrown by politicians in the form of data. I am really interested to know where from these data are collected. If they can never be verified, whatever one says is true isn't it?
With the prices of all commodities rising every year and no substantial salary increase of the common man, where from can they squeeze out a comfortable life? Has anything been done to answer these questions.
"For the underprivileged, the budget must continue to sow opportunities. And for the rest of us, allow us to enjoy the fruits of our own harvest."
Hope the media, NGO's and development agencies continue to discuss, debate, push and nag the government every week, every month to implement its plans and show results for allocations. And not just wake up next year on Feb 27th!
Listening to the FM's budget speech in full evoked in me a feeling similar to watching the annual Republic Day Parade. Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan, rural employment, mid-day meal and assorted other schemes named after members of the Gandhi-Nehru family were the first to march past.
I felt like making a trip to the nearest electrified village and doing a jig to the tune of 'thodi si dhool meri, dharti ki meri vatan ki'…If there is a road to reach that village in the first place.
Call me a cynic but this is how most of Young India feels when politicians rattle out statistics about 'development'. Seeing is believing and we don't like the dump of a country we see around a few islands of opulence and excellence.
Ironically, the FM's make a statement about young people building 'castles in the air'!
But sir, we're glad you used the word 'castle' and not humble jhopdi, or 1 room PWD apartment. We're glad that you approve of young India thinking and dreaming big. So are you.
Leaving aside the 'announcements' on duty cuts and tax tweaks which experts are better placed to analyse, what pleased me were some of the vision statements. Imagine an India where you don't have to stand in line to file a police complaint, get a birth certificate or register as a voter. Where you can demand information from government departments under the Right to Information Act through an online application.
No science fiction, that. The FM's plan to bring sarkari services online under a National E-governance plan. A more efficient and accountable government? Now that is something we will thank the FM for long after we've forgotten about cheaper soft drinks and Santros.
Speaking of thanks, students of Mumbai, Madras and Kolkata universities will be pleased with the Rs 50 crores allocated to each institution, in recognition of their completing 150 years. This is great news, except for the fact that the FM wants this money to be used for 'a specified research department or a research programme' when the problems that need to be addressed are far more basic!
And yet, as the minutes tick on, as achievements and proposed achievements parade by, you can't help getting carried away by a sense of pride. This is more just a 'budget', it is a document defining hope.
Because a budget implies 'living within one's means'. To which the young person's answer is I am not satisfied with that. Allow me to grow.
India is now a growth story and there is no looking back. What's more, the Finance Minister's end their speech with the immortal words of Swami Vivekananda, "We reap what we sow. We are the makers of our own fate. … our own destiny." Which is exactly what the young people of this country now believe.
For the underprivileged, the budget must continue to sow opportunities. And for the rest of us, allow us to enjoy the fruits of our own harvest.
There was more I wanted to say but could not due to the word limit. So here goes...
On education: The thrust of the budget outlay in education is towards primary and rural - rightly so. But higher education can't be left to fend for itself.
IISc Bangalore recieved Rs 100 crores in last to last year's budget towards upgradation and modernisation. Last year another well deserved Rs 100 crores went to Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
But what about a comprehensive policy that aims to upgrade all mediocre institutes to excellent ones, and the excellent to outstanding?
And also a quality control mechanism for private education. These are issues which of course need a whole separate forum for debate but if the primary schooling program is successful - imagine how many fold demand for higher education will increase say 10 years from now. And then, universities and colleges can't be set up or upgraded overnight!
On entrepreneurship: The Ministry of Finance has a pretty cool website where you can actually watch a webcast of the FM's speech and access budget speeches from previous years.
If you run a word search through the speeches you will find the word 'entrepreneur' used number of times.
Last year's speech specifically referred to young people building castles - and the FM said it is 'our job to lay the foundation for those castles'. So we enable you and you go out and create your own future.
Hope this translates to better power, roads, public transport - and other infrastructure which will allow us to be productive, not hassled citizens.
I am intrigued by this statement in particular: Recognize SMEs in the services sector, and treat the small scale enterprises in the services sector on par with the small scale enterprises in the manufacturing sector.
If this meant access to credit for entrepreneurs in the service sector it would be a great step forward. The idea of a world of commerce where you don't have plant and machinery to pledge as collateral remains alien to the loan officer in the average PSU bank. And this is a stumbling block for entrepreneurs, young and old alike.
On accountability and follow up: Not to say the FM's lie but achievements like '10,366 villages electrified' are - I hope - published separately and verified by independent agencies.
Lastly, this article in FE raises the pertinent question: Where are yesterday's budget ideas?
Before this year’s budget comes up with another list of new schemes for rural India and the environment, it may be worthwhile to look at where we have progressed with regard to some of the big announcements of earlier budgets.
The restoration of water bodies, the launching a horticulture mission, subsidies for micro-irrigation and the launching of a mega bio diesel plan were some of the major initiatives meant to breathe new life into India’s rural economy.
Unfortunately, by the time these schemes made their way through several ministries, it was already December 2005. With the end of the financial year round the corner, there was the usual rush to release money. In terms of actual work, however, there was very little to report.
Budgets I guess, have lost their relevance currently. Gone are the days when people used to assemble to hear luminaries like Nani Palkiwala give their take on the budget. The 91 budget was suppossed to be path breaking ..what did the newspapers report on the following say ..nobody told that india was entering a new era ..even now the major reforms are happening, but the budget is no indicator of the real policies and financial condition.
Doing away with the standard deduction for the salaried. So now the generally-no-way-out-of-the-tax salaried person is in the same league as a businessman, who has umpteen ways to hide his real income! Also sad to see the industry honchos giving unusually high marks to the FM. Why have such surveys in the first place when you know the boot licking industrialist won't dare say a word in earnest, for the fear of IT raids and other such govt retribution, if he publicly critises the FM.
What a whimper of budgets from the FM's. Seems like they are braindead...
Tax ATM usage. What!??
Wait there's more. Tax credit cards and debit cards further. Nuts !??!!
Umbrellas to cost more. Packaged food and poultry products to cost less, icecreams to cost less... blah blah !!
It seems like those old oppressive Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, VP Singh day budgets, where they decided the prices of little items like soap, detergents, toothbrushes, safety pins etc.
And in 2005, P.Chidambaram came up with the funniest harebrained idea .. withdrawal tax. If you withdraw your *own* money from the bank, you will be taxed.. ha haha..
Regarding grants to Universities, it seemed IISc haven't received 100 crores that it was granted last year. And, I can't vouch when will Madras, Bombay and Calcutta Universities receive their promised grants!! It happens only in India!!
And, in the last budget, there was an allocation of 1000 crores for a Desalination Plant in Chennai. Not a single word about that has come yet! Who is responsible? State or Central? What happens to such allocated but not spent money?
"But higher education can't be left to fend for itself. "
Primary and secondary education give far more social returns than higher / professional education.
Higher education should be liberalized and private players should be allowed to enter. The government should only set up an independent regulatory agency like the TRAI for the higher education sector. And yes, FDI should be allowed. Today, people are willing to pay for education. For those who can't, the private sector should offer scholarships to promising candidates. The not-so-promising ones can always get a loan - the banks will only be too happy to advance loans to students of good universities.
By giving a free rein to the market forces, the quality of education will automatically improve and stupid anomalies will disappear. It is good for the country to realise that it is the youth of this country that is going to take the country forward not someone like our esteemed politicians who are hell bend on wasting the country's money. For any development, infrastructure, transport and power is important. Unless and until we improve those, we will not be moving forward.
Does any one really verify the gibberish that is thrown by politicians in the form of data. I am really interested to know where from these data are collected. If they can never be verified, whatever one says is true isn't it?
With the prices of all commodities rising every year and no substantial salary increase of the common man, where from can they squeeze out a comfortable life? Has anything been done to answer these questions.
"For the underprivileged, the budget must continue to sow opportunities. And for the rest of us, allow us to enjoy the fruits of our own harvest."
Hope the media, NGO's and development agencies continue to discuss, debate, push and nag the government every week, every month to implement its plans and show results for allocations. And not just wake up next year on Feb 27th!
Sunday, January 2, 2011
India and Kashmir - K is for complacency
India risks storing up misery over Kashmir. It should grab a chance to do something more positive
MENTION Kashmir in polite Delhi society and noses wrinkle. Indians in the capital much prefer to talk of the economic boom, of India’s flourishing trade and its growing international heft. Old problems in the disputed, Muslim-majority territory in the mountainous north are waved off as a remote affair. They are not for foreigners to poke their noses into. And don’t begin to suggest that the world’s biggest democracy faces a growing problem in Kashmir, or that repressed Kashmiris have anything in common with the Palestinians or Tibetans.
Yet, in recent months, stone-pelting youths have launched their own intifada. Separatists have called for hartals, or self-imposed curfews, across the territory. And ill-trained Indian police have fired tear-gas and bullets with little care, killing over 110 people, mostly young and armed, if at all, only with crude projectiles. Deaths have spread bitterness, as have widespread reports of rape, torture and violent intimidation by Indian police. The chances are high that the miserable cycle of protests, deaths and funerals will resume in 2011.
India’s leaders are at least a bit embarrassed. They have promised better-trained police and sent three independent (if junior) interlocutors to hear Kashmiri grievances. The team is due to report within days. Yet the authorities are also harrying nationalist leaders in the territory. Separatists are often jailed or kept under house arrest. Demonstrations are usually banned. Western leaders, keen to keep India “onside” against China and greedy for its markets, have kept disgracefully quiet about human-rights abuses. On his visit in November Barack Obama uttered the K-word in public only when he was pressed by a questioner to do so.
It is not all bad. One silver lining is that Pakistan, which once devoted much malign energy to supporting an insurgency in Kashmir, is now preoccupied with its own fragility. Kashmiris, however troubled, are unlikely soon to return to the widespread armed militancy that used to claim thousands of lives a year. But India’s crushing of more moderate Kashmiri leaders is fostering other problems. The young stone-pelters are turning radical and religious. A mostly nationalistic dispute risks becoming ever more theological in much the same way as that between Israelis and Palestinians did.
A less complacent Indian government would work far harder to stop this slide. There is an immediate chance to seize the initiative while a winter freeze holds the troubled valley in its grip and before the pelting and shooting restart. It could signal that Kashmiris’ grievances will be taken seriously, for example by acting on the interlocutors’ report when it is released in January. Reducing the heavy presence of non-Kashmiris in uniform would ease tensions too. Cars cannot drive around Srinagar without manoeuvring past army roadblocks, snipers in pillboxes, lines of soldiers on the roadsides and military convoys. The security forces should be stopped from making arbitrary arrests. They should also allow nationalist political leaders to move and speak freely. That’s what democracies do.
Look to the horizon
In the longer term Indian leaders need to break their unhelpful silence on Kashmir’s prospects. The government will never allow the state to secede, let alone to join Pakistan. But India could agree to grant Kashmir greater political autonomy. It could concede that the army’s role in the territory will gradually diminish to one of mainly securing the line-of-control that divides it from Pakistani-run Kashmir. That would encourage the many Kashmiris who have taken part in Indian-run elections and who often accept in private that co-operation with India’s authorities would bring gains.
Perhaps India’s ruling Congress party, battered by corruption scandals, may not feel ready to brave Kashmir, especially if the opposition, the Hindu-dominated BJP, is hostile. Yet seeking reconciliation would be a sign not of weakness but of India’s growing confidence. Encouraging Kashmir’s moderate leaders is in the interests of all Indians—and of the West too.
Yet, in recent months, stone-pelting youths have launched their own intifada. Separatists have called for hartals, or self-imposed curfews, across the territory. And ill-trained Indian police have fired tear-gas and bullets with little care, killing over 110 people, mostly young and armed, if at all, only with crude projectiles. Deaths have spread bitterness, as have widespread reports of rape, torture and violent intimidation by Indian police. The chances are high that the miserable cycle of protests, deaths and funerals will resume in 2011.
India’s leaders are at least a bit embarrassed. They have promised better-trained police and sent three independent (if junior) interlocutors to hear Kashmiri grievances. The team is due to report within days. Yet the authorities are also harrying nationalist leaders in the territory. Separatists are often jailed or kept under house arrest. Demonstrations are usually banned. Western leaders, keen to keep India “onside” against China and greedy for its markets, have kept disgracefully quiet about human-rights abuses. On his visit in November Barack Obama uttered the K-word in public only when he was pressed by a questioner to do so.
It is not all bad. One silver lining is that Pakistan, which once devoted much malign energy to supporting an insurgency in Kashmir, is now preoccupied with its own fragility. Kashmiris, however troubled, are unlikely soon to return to the widespread armed militancy that used to claim thousands of lives a year. But India’s crushing of more moderate Kashmiri leaders is fostering other problems. The young stone-pelters are turning radical and religious. A mostly nationalistic dispute risks becoming ever more theological in much the same way as that between Israelis and Palestinians did.
A less complacent Indian government would work far harder to stop this slide. There is an immediate chance to seize the initiative while a winter freeze holds the troubled valley in its grip and before the pelting and shooting restart. It could signal that Kashmiris’ grievances will be taken seriously, for example by acting on the interlocutors’ report when it is released in January. Reducing the heavy presence of non-Kashmiris in uniform would ease tensions too. Cars cannot drive around Srinagar without manoeuvring past army roadblocks, snipers in pillboxes, lines of soldiers on the roadsides and military convoys. The security forces should be stopped from making arbitrary arrests. They should also allow nationalist political leaders to move and speak freely. That’s what democracies do.
Look to the horizon
In the longer term Indian leaders need to break their unhelpful silence on Kashmir’s prospects. The government will never allow the state to secede, let alone to join Pakistan. But India could agree to grant Kashmir greater political autonomy. It could concede that the army’s role in the territory will gradually diminish to one of mainly securing the line-of-control that divides it from Pakistani-run Kashmir. That would encourage the many Kashmiris who have taken part in Indian-run elections and who often accept in private that co-operation with India’s authorities would bring gains.
Perhaps India’s ruling Congress party, battered by corruption scandals, may not feel ready to brave Kashmir, especially if the opposition, the Hindu-dominated BJP, is hostile. Yet seeking reconciliation would be a sign not of weakness but of India’s growing confidence. Encouraging Kashmir’s moderate leaders is in the interests of all Indians—and of the West too.
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Happy New Year
New Year's Day is observed on January 1, the first day of the year on the modern Gregorian calendar also used in ancient Rome. In countries using the Gregorian calendar as their main calendar, it is a public holiday, often celebrated with fireworks at the stroke of midnight as the new year starts. January 1 on the Julian calendar corresponds to January 14 on the Gregorian calendar, and it is on that date that followers of some of the Eastern Orthodox churches celebrate the New Year.
Among the 7th century pagans of Flanders and the Netherlands, it was the custom to exchange gifts at the New Year. This was a pagan custom deplored by Saint Eligius (died 659 or 660), who warned the Flemings and Dutchmen, "(Do not) make vetulas, [little figures of the Old Woman], little deer or iotticos or set tables [for the house-elf, compare Puck] at night or exchange New Year gifts or supply superfluous drinks [another Yule custom]." The quote is from the vita of Eligius written by his companion, Ouen.
Most countries in Western Europe officially adopted January 1 as New Year's Day somewhat before they adopted the Gregorian calendar. In England, the Feast of the Annunciation on March 25, was the first day of the new year until the adoption of the Gregorian Calendar in 1752. The March 25 date was known as Annunciation Style; the January 1 date was known as Circumcision Style, because this was the date of the Feast of the Circumcision, being the eighth day counting from December 25 when Christ was believed to be born. This day was christened as the beginning of the New Year by Pope Gregory as he designed the Liturgical Calender.
People born on New Year's Day are commonly called New Year babies. Hospitals, such as the Dyersburg Regional Medical Center in the U.S., give out prizes to the first baby born in that hospital in the new year. These prizes are often donated by local businesses. Prizes may include various baby related items such as baby formula, baby blankets, diapers, and gift certificates to stores which specialize in baby related merchandise.
History
Probably observed on March 1 in the old Roman Calendar, the World Book Encyclopedia of 1984, volume 14, page 237 states: "The Roman ruler Julius Caesar established January 1 as New Year's Day in 46 BC. The Romans dedicated this day to Janus, the god of gates, doors, and beginnings. The month of January was named after Janus, who had two faces - one looking forward and the other looking backward." This suggests that New Year's celebrations are founded on pagan traditions. Some have suggested this occurred in 153 BC, when it was stipulated that the two annual consuls (after whose names the years were identified) entered into office on that day, though no consensus exists on the matter. Dates in March, coinciding with the spring equinox, or commemorating the Annunciation of Jesus, along with a variety of Christian feast dates were used throughout the Middle Ages, though calendars often continued to display the months in columns running from January to December.Among the 7th century pagans of Flanders and the Netherlands, it was the custom to exchange gifts at the New Year. This was a pagan custom deplored by Saint Eligius (died 659 or 660), who warned the Flemings and Dutchmen, "(Do not) make vetulas, [little figures of the Old Woman], little deer or iotticos or set tables [for the house-elf, compare Puck] at night or exchange New Year gifts or supply superfluous drinks [another Yule custom]." The quote is from the vita of Eligius written by his companion, Ouen.
Most countries in Western Europe officially adopted January 1 as New Year's Day somewhat before they adopted the Gregorian calendar. In England, the Feast of the Annunciation on March 25, was the first day of the new year until the adoption of the Gregorian Calendar in 1752. The March 25 date was known as Annunciation Style; the January 1 date was known as Circumcision Style, because this was the date of the Feast of the Circumcision, being the eighth day counting from December 25 when Christ was believed to be born. This day was christened as the beginning of the New Year by Pope Gregory as he designed the Liturgical Calender.
New Year's Days in other calendars
In cultures which traditionally or currently use calendars other than the Gregorian, New Year's Day is often also an important celebration. Some countries concurrently use the Gregorian and another calendar. New Year's Day in the alternative calendar attracts alternative celebrations of New year. If living abroad and the calendar used in the country of origin differs from the calendar used in the country of location, New Year's Day may be celebrated on both dates.
- Israel is one country that uses the Gregorian calendar but does not formally celebrate the New Year's holiday — mainly due to objections by religious parties on the holiday's non-Jewish origins. However, there are Israeli Jews who partake in some sort of celebration. The date of the Jewish new year is celebrated on Rosh Hashanah no matter where the location. The date of the Islamic New Year moves from year to year because the Islamic calendar is lunar.
- Hindu New Year falls at the time and date Sun enters Mesha on the Hindu calendar. Hindus celebrate the new year by paying respects to their parents and other elders and seek their blessings. They also exchange tokens of good wishes for healthy and prosperous year ahead.
- Japanese New Year in Japan is celebrated on January 1 because the Gregorian calendar is now used instead of the Chinese calendar.
- Chinese New Year is celebrated in many countries around the world. It is the first day of the lunar calendar. It is celebrated in numerous countries such as Korea, Vietnam, and many other Asian countries that have Chinese heritage or follows the lunar calendar. It can also be seen internationally since the Chinese population is widely spread out. It is celebrated with plenty of good food, lucky red envelopes (filled with money), families, and many things red (which resembles good luck). Lion and dragon dance, drums, fireworks, firecrackers, and other entertainments will fill the streets. It is the favorite holiday for many Chinese adults and children.
Traditional and modern celebrations and customs
New Year's Eve
January 1 represents the fresh start of a new year after a period of remembrance of the passing year, including on radio, television and in newspapers, which starts in early December in countries around the world. Publications have year-end articles that review the changes during the previous year. There are also articles on planned or expected changes in the coming year. This day is traditionally a religious feast, but since the 1900's has become an occasion to celebrate the night of December 31, called New Year's Eve. There are fireworks at midnight at the moment the new year arrives.- In Russia and former USSR, the celebration of Old New Year or Novi God is greeted by fireworks and drinking champagne. The New Year is considered a family celebration, with a lavish dinner tables and gifts. The president of Russia normally counts down the final seconds of the "old year", as it is called in Russia. A giant clock tower chimes in the new year, and it is customary to make a wish with each chime.
- In Brazil, celebrations are held around the nation. Most famous is the celebration in Rio de Janeiro.
- In Australia, celebrations are held around the nation.
- In New York City, the 11,875-pound (5,386-kg), 12-foot-diameter (3.7-m) Times Square Ball located high above Times Square is lowered starting at 11:59 p.m., with a countdown from :10 seconds until :01, when it reaches the bottom of its tower. The arrival of the new year is announced at the stroke of midnight with fireworks, music and a live celebration that is broadcast nationwide.
- In the United States, it is traditional to spend this occasion together with loved ones. A toast is made to the new year, with kisses, fireworks and parties among the customs. It is popular to make a New Year's resolution, although that is optional.
- Junkanoo parade, in Nassau, Bahamas.
- In Scotland, there are many special customs associated with the New Year. These are a part of the Scottish celebration Hogmanay, the Scots name for New Year's Eve. The famous street party in Princes Street in Edinburgh is one example.
- In Wales, Calennig is celebrated, with celebrations attracting thousands of people in the capital, Cardiff.
- In London, thousands gather along the Embankment on the River Thames to watch the fireworks around the London Eye.
- In European countries, the New Year is greeted with private fireworks. This day is also the occasion to make bonfires of discarded Christmas trees in some countries.
- In Greece, families and relatives switch off the lights at midnight, then celebrate by cutting the "vassilopita" (Basil's pie) which usually contains one coin or equivalent. Whoever wins expects luck for the whole year. After the pie, a traditional game of cards called "triantaena" (31) follows.
- In Davos, Switzerland, the final match of the Spengler Cup ice hockey Tournament is usually held on this day by tradition.
- In the Philippines, fireworks, booming sound system as well as make a lot of noise with the belief that the noises would scare evil spirits away, preventing them from bringing bad luck to the coming new year. The tables are laden with food for the Media Noche or midnight meal, and there is a basket of 12 different round fruits to symbolize prosperity in each of the coming year's 12 months. Public new year parties like those in New York and Sydney are also available to the people and very well attended.
- On New Year's Day, people in certain countries gather on beaches and run into the water to celebrate the new year. In Canada, the Republic of Ireland, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the Netherlands this is very popular. These events are sometimes known as polar bear plunges, and are sometimes organized by groups to raise money for charity. Polar Bear Clubs in many Northern Hemisphere cities near bodies of water, have a tradition of holding organized plunges on New Year's Day.
New Year's Day
The celebrations held world-wide on January 1 as part of New Year's Day commonly include the following:- Parades
- Football, usually college football in the United States
- Ice hockey, most famously the Winter Classic
- Concerts
- Entertainment, usually enjoyed from the comfort of home.
- Family time
- Traditional meals
- Church services
New Year's babies
In Brittany, a common image used is that of an incarnation of Father Time (or the "Old Year") wearing a sash across his chest with the previous year printed on it passing on his duties to the Baby New Year (or the "New Year"), an infant wearing a sash with the new year printed on it. In modern time and world-wide, the association of parenthood is with a baby's arrival, with New Year's Eve a father and mother together presenting their newborn child as the new year arrives and is celebrated.People born on New Year's Day are commonly called New Year babies. Hospitals, such as the Dyersburg Regional Medical Center in the U.S., give out prizes to the first baby born in that hospital in the new year. These prizes are often donated by local businesses. Prizes may include various baby related items such as baby formula, baby blankets, diapers, and gift certificates to stores which specialize in baby related merchandise.
Other celebrations on January 1
Some churches celebrate the Feast of the Circumcision of Christ on January 1, based on the belief that Jesus was born on December 25, and that, according to Jewish tradition, his circumcision would have taken place on the eighth day of his life (which would be January 1). The Catholic Church has also given the name Feast of the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God to their holy day on January 1.Monday, December 27, 2010
Honest is, as honest does
Integrity, in the job of the Prime Minister, demands putting national interest above partisan politics and personal loyalties. By that standard Dr.Manmohan Singh can't be called a "man of integirty".
Today, the Indian media - both print and television - is focusing on the recent corruption scandals involving the UPA Government with unusual zeal. However, I fail to understand why almost every commentator, every TV anchor, every editorial writer feels compelled to pay ritual obeisance to the "personal honesty and integrity" of Dr. Manmohan Singh while dealing with the scandals emanating from his Cabinet colleagues. They do so even when there is clear evidence that the Prime Minister was well aware of various shady deals, as in the case of telecom scam, and that he did nothing to stop the brazen economic crimes indulged in by his ministerial colleagues over the last six years.
Likewise, getting a Rajya Sabha seat from Assam claiming he is a resident of the state when he has never had any such connection with Assam is a definite indicator of questionable political integrity. A PM who compromises national interest, as in Kashmir, just to indulge the personal fancy of the PM-in-waiting, a PM who looks the other way while his Cabinet colleagues brazenly loot public funds and get away with extorting thousands of crores by way of kickbacks, a PM who is widely perceived and lampooned as a "rubber stamp" does not merit being called "an honest man" or a "man of integrity"; in his job, integrity demands putting national interest above partisan politics and personal loyalties. Integrity also involves taking full responsibility for all his acts of commission and omission which have earned UPA II the dubious distinction of being publicly named as the most corrupt and rudderless government in post independence India.
A very honest & unfaltering account of present day farce in governance. It's disheartening to be led by a puppet leader. Alas, where are such leaders who think about national interest over self-interest?
Sun Tzu in his treatise "The art of War" stated that an over compassionate leader brings only destruction and Dr. Manmohan Singh is a rather shining example. Wish he would have showed this compassion to the people of India rather than the party high command.
There is such an image built around Dr. Manmohan Singh which now seems like a mask. Integrity is of no use if it cannot command any affirmative action. Even his predecessor Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee was in the same boat.
During the last three weeks, when parliament was defunct, we never heard or saw him anywhere, neither the UPA president and the aspiring PM who talks a lot about good governance. PM's placing, PM's continuation in the position raises another concern who planted him at PM office. Because in the recent past he appeared public only when any foreign delegation comes and he has to sign commercial contracts rather diplomatic negotiations. The political discourse of the country seems to be dictated by somebody outside or some powerful incorporate inside.
Our PM, whom the corporate media wants to keep aloof from the charges of corruption. I remember how Smt. Indira Gandhi was hounded by the media then for corruption charges against her/government when the charges were nothing compared to present day charges. It is a pity to note that the so called intellectuals are comparing NDA/Yedurappa's corruption to divert the real issue. A person who secured a vote of confidence with hundreds of crores of rupees being paid as bribes to MPs, how can he be described as an honest man? Being the head of the government Dr. Manmohan Singh cannot pretend to be honest when the biggest ever scam has occurred and he is fully aware of the murky deals indulged by his ministers.
The Emperor of Integrity has no clothes now. This required critical analysis and integrity. Integrity in any field is not only to perform according to one's conviction but also to act on the basis of one's knowledge and not to be blinded by emotion. This is what Dr. Manmohan Singh has done so far in his supplicant role to the Congress party.
No one in India can claim to be entirely honest. Similarly, no one can be condemned as wholly dishonest. There is indeed cent percent collective dishonesty in India. But, as far as possible one can be honest singularly. But, collectively, it is not possible in India to be fully honest despite wanting to be so.
The PM is only a victim of such a situation where some of his junior colleagues are alleged to have committed the cardinal sin without his knowledge. Now, sadly, the collective responsibility has fallen on him.
He is more sinned against than sinning himself.
I was a firm supporter of the PM and his governance in UPA I. In fact, the way he stuck to his point in the nuclear deal, whether right or wrong being a different question altogether, removed any myth in the mind of the opposition whether he was a weak PM. I have personally felt that any links with US have to be dealt with caution due to their bloody present and past. In the last few years, the PM's closeness to US almost seems to raise suspicion.
In spite of the immense poverty and the destruction of agriculture sector in this country, the PM continues in his industry-oriented economic path. His three favourite letters in the English language are surely G-D-P. The Radia tapes have only shown how our industries operate. I hope at least now he wakes up to the reality and realizes that India is a socialist republic.
The PM is now weaker than ever before, not least because of Madame Sonia Gandhi, but due to inaction against corrupt practices.
Today, the Indian media - both print and television - is focusing on the recent corruption scandals involving the UPA Government with unusual zeal. However, I fail to understand why almost every commentator, every TV anchor, every editorial writer feels compelled to pay ritual obeisance to the "personal honesty and integrity" of Dr. Manmohan Singh while dealing with the scandals emanating from his Cabinet colleagues. They do so even when there is clear evidence that the Prime Minister was well aware of various shady deals, as in the case of telecom scam, and that he did nothing to stop the brazen economic crimes indulged in by his ministerial colleagues over the last six years.
Corruption is not only about personally accepting monetary bribes and stacking them away in hidden bank accounts overseas, buying benami properties or accepting diamond sets for your wife. Corruption can come in insidious avatars, such as knowingly turning a blind eye to misuse the entire machinery of governance to serve private ends of a few individuals, even to the point of endangering national security. For example, not a single person has been punished thus far for supplying sub standard bullet proof jackets to the police handling the 9/11 terrorist attack in Mumbai. Not surprisingly, we are right now witnessing yet another scam involving sub standard bullet proof vests.
In recent weeks, some of our most respected columnists have been warning us that we should look at institutional reform rather than target individuals because it can lead to loss of faith in democratic institutions. But how do you retain faith in democratic institutions if powerful individuals use their office to systematically subvert the autonomy and credibility of institutions meant as watchdogs of democracy? The best of institutions take no time in becoming slavish instruments of partisan agendas if you plant subservient and heavily compromised individuals at their helm.
People attribute his pliability to the fact that the prime minister was appointed and not elected.
Dr Manmohan Singh cannot escape responsibility for appointing people with dubious credentials to occupy key positions of power - starting with the appointment of Pratibha Devisingh Patil as the President of India. This despite the fact that that Congress leaders of her own district protested vehemently against her appointment because of her and her close kin's direct involvement in criminal cases. Thereafter, all key institutions, including the Election Commission, the Central Vigilance Commission have been filled with people whose credentials have been questioned not just by the opposition but also the media and respected public figures.
He has also provided key portfolios to people with a proven track record of brazen corruption. For example, IAS officer, Mr Lalli the CEO of Prasar Bharati that manages Doordarshan has been guilty of countless corrupt deals and practices. Despite numerous agitations by the staff of Doordarshan to get him punished, he continues lording over the institution because he is supposed to have the PM's backing.
This regime has also gone out of its way to protect those judges of the High Courts and Supreme Court who have such serious corruption charges against them as to merit impeachment and criminal trials. Justice Dinakaran of the Karnataka High Court was saved from the wrath of and boycott by the legal fraternity of Karnataka by being transferred to Sikkim High Court despite loud protests by people in Sikkim. Judges who are alleged to have shared in the loot of Provident Fund of class 1V employees in UP have not been subject to investigation, leave alone punishment. One of them retired after serving a full term in the Supreme Court. The kingpin of the scam who later provided evidence of the complicity of the judges died under mysterious circumstances in jail.
Supreme Court Justice Sabharwal was likewise protected from prosecution even though the allegations against him during UPA's first term were no less serious than that of Kalmadi. He is alleged to have ordered demolition of numerous commercial centres and complexes in Delhi in order to benefit his son's investment in high end malls, causing havoc for lakhs of small and big commercial property owners of Delhi.
The CWG scam is not just about misappropriation of funds through inflated bills and money being paid to bogus companies. It all started with the politician-contractor mafia being allowed to violate all environmental laws to convert the Yamuna floodplains into prime real estate by building luxury apartments in the name of Games Village. This happened despite the High Court ban on all construction activity on the floodplains.
It needed the influence of people far more powerful than Kalmadi to persuade the Supreme Court into over ruling the considered view of the High Court and ensuring that Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh looked the other way when all environmental laws were being brazenly flouted right under his nose to build high rise apartments and other commercial structures on the floodplains. The game plan behind building luxury apartments on the forbidden land became obvious from the fact that the builders had to be whip lashed into completing at least half the apartments before the Commonwealth Games. They were obviously given to understand that the CWG was merely a fig leaf for converting floodplains into prime real estate in the heart of Delhi.
The choice of the company that built the Games Village, the names of its real owners, its unknown and known partners, and the list of its known and unknown beneficiaries will reveal a scam more insidious than the Adarsh Housing Scam of Mumbai which involved Congress Party CM and other politicians, top ranking officials of the armed forces and bureaucrats cornering luxury apartments in a prime location in a housing society set up in the name of Kargil widows. In this case too, the only visible action taken by the Prime Minister is to replace the Chief Minister of Maharashtra. No sign of any heads rolling as yet.
Or take the example of the most politically sensitive state of Kashmir. Dr. Manmohan Singh allowed an anti-Omar agitation to turn into an anti India agitation much against his own counsel, all because he dare not sack Omar Abdullah from the CM's post even when the entire Valley rose in revolt against his high handed, corrupt and callous regime. Senior Congress leaders admit in private that Omar cannot be touched since he is a buddy of Rahul Gandhi. Dr Singh knows well that Omar's continuation has given a new lease of life to the Pakistan-inspired separatist and terrorist movement in Kashmir.
People attribute his pliability to the fact that the prime minister was appointed and not elected. He has never won a Lok Sabha election. But that cannot be used as an excuse to justify overlooking such gross mismanagement and loot as well as the political drift one witnesses even in areas involving national security.
In fact, his defeat in the one and only election he ever fought is related to his lack of personal integrity. He was defeated in the predominantly middle-class South Delhi constituency because people in general and Sikhs in particular were enraged when Manmohan Singh denied the role of the Congress in the 1984 Anti Sikh carnage and instead attributed the 1984 massacre to the RSS. The RSS may well be guilty of many other communal riots but the credit for the 1984 massacre goes entirely to Congress politicians, including Rajiv Gandhi who even justified the killings saying: "when a big tree falls, the earth is bound to shake." The Congress Party also ensured that those who masterminded and executed the 1984 pogram did not get punished.
Similarly, in the case of Gujarat riots, the Prime Minister happily joined the chorus initiated by his boss pillorying Narendra Modi as "Maut ka Saudagar" even though it is well known that Congress party cadres merrily joined the riotous mobs unleashed by BJP--RSS combine in Ahmedabad and elsewhere. This failure to own responsibility for the conduct of his party men and passing the entire responsibility on to Modi is in large part responsible for the lack of credibility of Congress Party in Gujarat and the severe erosion of its political base in Gujarat.
A very honest & unfaltering account of present day farce in governance. It's disheartening to be led by a puppet leader. Alas, where are such leaders who think about national interest over self-interest?
Sun Tzu in his treatise "The art of War" stated that an over compassionate leader brings only destruction and Dr. Manmohan Singh is a rather shining example. Wish he would have showed this compassion to the people of India rather than the party high command.
There is such an image built around Dr. Manmohan Singh which now seems like a mask. Integrity is of no use if it cannot command any affirmative action. Even his predecessor Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee was in the same boat.
During the last three weeks, when parliament was defunct, we never heard or saw him anywhere, neither the UPA president and the aspiring PM who talks a lot about good governance. PM's placing, PM's continuation in the position raises another concern who planted him at PM office. Because in the recent past he appeared public only when any foreign delegation comes and he has to sign commercial contracts rather diplomatic negotiations. The political discourse of the country seems to be dictated by somebody outside or some powerful incorporate inside.
Our PM, whom the corporate media wants to keep aloof from the charges of corruption. I remember how Smt. Indira Gandhi was hounded by the media then for corruption charges against her/government when the charges were nothing compared to present day charges. It is a pity to note that the so called intellectuals are comparing NDA/Yedurappa's corruption to divert the real issue. A person who secured a vote of confidence with hundreds of crores of rupees being paid as bribes to MPs, how can he be described as an honest man? Being the head of the government Dr. Manmohan Singh cannot pretend to be honest when the biggest ever scam has occurred and he is fully aware of the murky deals indulged by his ministers.
The Emperor of Integrity has no clothes now. This required critical analysis and integrity. Integrity in any field is not only to perform according to one's conviction but also to act on the basis of one's knowledge and not to be blinded by emotion. This is what Dr. Manmohan Singh has done so far in his supplicant role to the Congress party.
No one in India can claim to be entirely honest. Similarly, no one can be condemned as wholly dishonest. There is indeed cent percent collective dishonesty in India. But, as far as possible one can be honest singularly. But, collectively, it is not possible in India to be fully honest despite wanting to be so.
The PM is only a victim of such a situation where some of his junior colleagues are alleged to have committed the cardinal sin without his knowledge. Now, sadly, the collective responsibility has fallen on him.
He is more sinned against than sinning himself.
I was a firm supporter of the PM and his governance in UPA I. In fact, the way he stuck to his point in the nuclear deal, whether right or wrong being a different question altogether, removed any myth in the mind of the opposition whether he was a weak PM. I have personally felt that any links with US have to be dealt with caution due to their bloody present and past. In the last few years, the PM's closeness to US almost seems to raise suspicion.
In spite of the immense poverty and the destruction of agriculture sector in this country, the PM continues in his industry-oriented economic path. His three favourite letters in the English language are surely G-D-P. The Radia tapes have only shown how our industries operate. I hope at least now he wakes up to the reality and realizes that India is a socialist republic.
The PM is now weaker than ever before, not least because of Madame Sonia Gandhi, but due to inaction against corrupt practices.
PUSHBACK TIME IN BIHAR - They hit back, "and it felt good"
A public hearing on NREGA in a remote village in Bihar created a confrontation between a leader accused of corruption and the workers who exposed him.
A hot, open field in a remote countryside in Bihar. The location: Saurgaon village in the Kursakata Block of Araria district. Hundreds of workers were lined up in front, waiting patiently for their turn. The occasion was a public hearing, organized by Jan Jagaran Shakti Sanghatan(JJSS), a new local social movement, which had recently been formed to support the workers struggle for employment.
File picture of a JJSS-organised public hearing at Bhangahi panchayat, Narpatganj block, Bihar on July 8th, 2010. Pic: JJSS.
The gathering at the public hearing at Bhangahi. Pic: JJSS.
This caused a great uproar, very soon the workers got up and started running towards the Mukhya shouting "“hit him, hit him”. Suddenly sticks appeared and they were charging up to the Mukhya, who was immediately whisked away to safety. Everybody was running and shouting and there was a minor scuffle between Mukhya’s men and some of the workers.
A hot, open field in a remote countryside in Bihar. The location: Saurgaon village in the Kursakata Block of Araria district. Hundreds of workers were lined up in front, waiting patiently for their turn. The occasion was a public hearing, organized by Jan Jagaran Shakti Sanghatan(JJSS), a new local social movement, which had recently been formed to support the workers struggle for employment.
A tent had been set up for the occasion. It was already full with people from the local Panchayat, but more villagers continued to trickle in. The hearing began with the organizers singing some revolutionary workers’ songs. Immediately after, 34-year-old Ashish Ranjan, one of the organisers of the event, took to the podium and demanded, "Have you ever seen a muster roll?" A resounding "NO!" shook the tent. “Have you had one hundred days of employment?” Again, “NO!” Ranjan proceeded to explain that the purpose of the meeting was to inform people about their rights and to present the results from a recent audit.
A week prior, he was working with some volunteers, who were preparing for a village survey. They were looking at the government records of a village that they are going to audit. One volunteer noticed, "The same road is listed on two different yojanas”. Another retorted, I see a similar case in my register as well. The following day, they visited some villages to track down the road, where they heard that the work was not even completed the first time around, leave alone having multiple projects. So, it seemed to be a clear case of one work having different names to trick the people.
To one worker, Kanchi (name changed), 35, they said, "It looks like you’ve worked 40 days this past year, received Rs. 4000 for it in your account, and then subsequently withdrew it." Kanchi gave them a blank look, which quickly turned to rage. All of the other passbooks indicated similar activity, and the villagers became increasingly agitated. Another volunteer asked, "Are you saying that you haven't received this money?” They replied, "No, not at all."
The meeting re-started and the atmosphere remained tense, the scuffle had ironically brought the agenda to sharp focus. This was exactly the kind of illegitimate activity that JJSS was interested in unearthing, so they asked the villagers to come to the following week’s public hearing. Most hesitated, but then agreed to come. When they asked people to sign a written testimonial, a few refused, saying, "I can’t sign this paper. I need to live here." They feared retaliation from government officials.
Later, the fear spread to the other villagers, and some even demanded that they return the written testimonial. Later in the evening, they encountered some of the villagers. They were having a drink and discussing the day’s events. Kanchi was among them, and they all began to discuss the hearing. Kanchi voiced everyone’s worries: "These b*t*ds will kill us. I’m not scared, but some people are." They assured them that JJSS would remain in the area and that they would provide support.
One week later at the public hearing, Ranjan laid down the protocol of the event: “Lift your hands to speak, and come to the microphone in the front to speak." He noted that the proceedings would be video recorded.
Manoj Singh, 50, the panchayat president, got up first to speak. He said, "Everything is going well in this village. All the work has been done and everybody was paid." Then, results from the audit were read out, making clear gross disparities in claims between the government records and from the survey.
Kanchi raised his hand to speak: “My name is Kanchi and I am from Boratola (name changed).”
Ranjan asked, "The government records say that you worked on a project to move sand from Ram's house to Krishna's. Did you do so, and how much were you paid?” “Yes, sir, I did work on that project.”
“The government records show,” Ranjan continued, “that you worked for 40 days and were paid Rs.4000. Is that correct?” “No, sir, I have not been paid that much money. I only got Rs.1000". Someone immediately shouted, "He is lying!"
Kanchi was livid. He pointed towards Singh, the panchayat leader and said, "He’s a crook. He and his cronies must have taken the rest of my money, whole 3000 rupees!" Mukhya rose up, rushed over to grab the microphone, and then hit Kanchi on the head with the microphone stand. The entire proceedings occurred in front of 500 people and was caught on video.
The activists were running clutching the documents they had tightly so that they weren’t taken away in the commotion. Soon, the activists brought the meeting to order. Singh returned, and everybody sat down. The meeting re-started and the atmosphere remained tense, the scuffle had ironically brought the agenda to sharp focus. The testimonials continued to pile up, but the workers were careful not to name-call and stuck to facts. People were clapping and cheering and backing up every testimonial from whoever had the courage to come and speak up. The clerks contested the evidence and gave counter testimonials. Some workers also stepped up to support this view and attested that they have been paid fully for their work and there are no problems in the village. These testimonies were often booed.
Singh finally got up and said, “I have listened to the workers complaints, and I now know that there are problems but I wish that somebody had told me earlier.” He promised with a sly smile that he would take action and ensure that wages are returned to workers and will secure employment for everyone. The meeting ended and the testimonials were submitted to the Mukhya, the media and to the district collector’s office.
The next morning on visiting the village, where Kanchi lived and on finding him, he said, “Mukhya (panchayat leader Manoj Singh) had come by in his car that night and had threatened the people in the village for speaking out”. But Kanchi added, looking away, “he can’t do anything to me”. On asking him, “what do you think will happen”, he said we have been discussing that in the village, it is unclear what will change.
But, he added, “in the last 10 years that this Mukhya is in power, I have never seen him s**t in his pants like this”. He gleefully added, “and it felt good”.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)